The turf war between road concessionaire Estradas de Portugal (EP) and the Portuguese Accounts Court – the independent state body responsible for auditing major public works - has escalated after the Court refused to grant a ratifying visa in a preliminary decision on the Transmontana and Douro Interior road concessions. EP had argued that the road projects did not need the ratification of the Accounts Court because it is independent of the state as an SA, but the Court has ruled the projects fall within its jurisdiction.
The Court is rejecting the visas on a legal rather than economic issue, stating that because there were changes to the specification of the projects between indicative bids and the BAFO stage, however slight, the BAFO stage should not have restricted the bidding field to two competitors on competition grounds.
The consequence of the Court's decision means that the drawdown schedule for both projects...
You must be logged in to view this page. If you are already a subscriber, or have an active trial, simply log in below.
If you’re not a registered user, you can get access to the website by taking a free trial. You can register for a trial online or by contacting our sales team – simply email benchbase@projectfinancemagazine.com or call +44 (0) 20 7779 8284.
Subscribe
Subscribers have unlimited access to all current and archive content. Start your
subscription today - click on the button below.
Subscribe
Free trial
Taking a free trial will give you access to the latest news and analysis, as
well as the online deals database, BenchBase. Start your free trial today.
Free Trial